PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMHIX vs. AHMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMHIX vs. AHMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMHIX having a 2.23% return and AHMFX slightly higher at 2.33%. Over the past 10 years, AMHIX has underperformed AHMFX with an annualized return of 3.29%, while AHMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.48% annualized return.


AMHIX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.23%
6M
2.71%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
3.29%

AHMFX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.99%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.83%
1Y
8.64%
3Y*
6.40%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
3.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMHIX vs. AHMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
2.23%5.70%6.19%7.18%-12.59%5.28%4.39%8.88%1.59%8.89%
AHMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2
2.33%6.03%6.45%7.04%-12.44%5.49%4.61%9.12%1.80%9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between AMHIX and AHMFX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

1.00

The correlation between AMHIX and AHMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMHIX vs. AHMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMHIX
AMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

AHMFX
AHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMHIX vs. AHMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMHIXAHMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.69

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.12

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.73

11.16

-0.44

AMHIX vs. AHMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the AHMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMHIX and AHMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMHIXAHMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

2.82

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.39

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.77

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

1.54

-0.14

Drawdowns

AMHIX vs. AHMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMHIX drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, which is greater than AHMFX's maximum drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMHIX and AHMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMHIXAHMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.74%

-17.65%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-2.76%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.25%

-6.20%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.81%

-17.65%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.81%

-17.65%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-2.37%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.77%

+0.01%

Volatility

AMHIX vs. AHMFX - Volatility Comparison

American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) have volatilities of 1.10% and 1.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMHIXAHMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.11%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

2.22%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03%

3.06%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.84%

4.86%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.53%

4.55%

-0.02%

AMHIX vs. AHMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMHIX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than AHMFX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMHIX vs. AHMFX - Dividend Comparison

AMHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than AHMFX's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2
4.12%5.58%4.04%2.97%2.71%3.44%3.60%3.68%3.88%4.19%3.74%4.19%
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
3.88%5.26%3.80%3.10%2.53%3.23%3.40%3.46%3.67%4.01%3.55%4.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, AMHIX and AHMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AHMFX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to AMHIX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMHIX dropped -21.74% vs AHMFX's -17.65%.

AHMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMHIX and AHMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer