PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMGOX vs. VMFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMGOX vs. VMFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Fund (AMGOX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMGOX achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than VMFGX's 19.43% return. Over the past 10 years, AMGOX has outperformed VMFGX with an annualized return of 12.51%, while VMFGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.68% annualized return.


AMGOX

1D
1.48%
1M
2.97%
YTD
6.34%
6M
5.19%
1Y
19.82%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
12.51%

VMFGX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.86%
YTD
19.43%
6M
18.74%
1Y
30.53%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMGOX vs. VMFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMGOX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Fund
6.34%16.76%21.07%23.17%-36.14%5.45%64.79%30.24%-7.42%26.90%
VMFGX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
19.43%7.43%15.86%17.42%-18.99%18.83%22.61%26.20%-10.39%19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between AMGOX and VMFGX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.88

The correlation between AMGOX and VMFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMGOX vs. VMFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMGOX
AMGOX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AMGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AMGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VMFGX
VMFGX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VMFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMGOX vs. VMFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Fund (AMGOX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMGOXVMFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

3.08

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

12.26

-8.46

AMGOX vs. VMFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMGOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the VMFGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMGOX and VMFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMGOXVMFGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

1.81

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.43

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.56

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.65

-0.26

Drawdowns

AMGOX vs. VMFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMGOX drawdown since its inception was -68.10%, which is greater than VMFGX's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMGOX and VMFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMGOXVMFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.10%

-39.15%

-28.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.25%

-9.91%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.34%

-25.45%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.22%

-29.25%

-29.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.22%

-39.15%

-20.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.24%

0.00%

-21.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-5.70%

-12.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

2.48%

+2.60%

Volatility

AMGOX vs. VMFGX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Fund (AMGOX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) at 4.98%. This indicates that AMGOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMGOXVMFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

4.98%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

13.06%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

16.82%

+2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.43%

20.61%

+18.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.12%

21.05%

+11.07%

AMGOX vs. VMFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMGOX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMGOX vs. VMFGX - Dividend Comparison

AMGOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VMFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMGOX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.72%55.13%12.13%12.09%18.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMFGX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.59%0.70%0.84%1.21%1.12%0.53%0.79%1.22%1.18%0.93%1.14%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMGOX and VMFGX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMGOX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to VMFGX (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMGOX dropped -68.10% vs VMFGX's -39.15%.

VMFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMGOX and VMFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer