PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMGN vs. MA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMGN vs. MA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amgen Inc. (AMGN) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMGN achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than MA's -13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, AMGN has underperformed MA with an annualized return of 11.48%, while MA has yielded a comparatively higher 18.35% annualized return.


AMGN

1D
1.15%
1M
6.38%
YTD
8.36%
6M
7.51%
1Y
25.42%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
11.48%

MA

1D
1.93%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
-13.70%
6M
-9.69%
1Y
-15.62%
3Y*
9.57%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
18.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMGN vs. MA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
8.36%29.67%-6.77%13.46%20.43%0.87%-1.99%27.60%15.23%22.27%
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
-13.70%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%1.16%20.19%59.16%25.31%47.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AMGN and MA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2006

0.34

The correlation between AMGN and MA shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMGN:

$190.17B

MA:

$438.53B

EPS

AMGN:

$14.38

MA:

$17.28

PE Ratio

AMGN:

24.31

MA:

28.43

PEG Ratio

AMGN:

1.40

MA:

1.66

PS Ratio

AMGN:

5.09

MA:

13.04

PB Ratio

AMGN:

20.69

MA:

65.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMGN:

$37.24B

MA:

$33.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMGN:

$26.61B

MA:

$26.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMGN:

$17.27B

MA:

$21.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMGN vs. MA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMGN
AMGN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AMGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMGN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AMGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMGN Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMGN vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amgen Inc. (AMGN) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMGNMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.89

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

-0.75

+2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

-1.54

+5.15

AMGN vs. MA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMGN Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the MA Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMGN and MA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMGNMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

-0.71

+1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.28

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.68

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.83

-0.22

Drawdowns

AMGN vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMGN drawdown since its inception was -63.48%, roughly equal to the maximum MA drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMGN and MA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMGNMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.48%

-62.67%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.57%

-20.91%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.74%

-20.91%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

-28.25%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.86%

-41.00%

+16.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

-17.64%

+8.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.78%

-9.82%

-6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.06%

10.19%

-3.13%

Volatility

AMGN vs. MA - Volatility Comparison

Amgen Inc. (AMGN) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA) have volatilities of 6.28% and 6.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMGNMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

6.54%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.17%

17.46%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.32%

22.23%

+5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.88%

23.98%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.81%

26.92%

-2.11%

Dividends

AMGN vs. MA - Dividend Comparison

AMGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than MA's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
2.80%2.91%3.45%2.96%2.95%3.13%2.78%2.41%2.71%2.65%2.74%1.95%
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
0.66%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%

Financials

AMGN vs. MA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amgen Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
8.62B
8.40B
(AMGN) Total Revenue
(MA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMGN vs. MA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amgen Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
68.2%
58.4%
Portfolio components
AMGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.87B and revenue of 8.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

MA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

AMGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 8.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

MA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.

AMGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported a net income of 1.82B and revenue of 8.62B, resulting in a net margin of 21.1%.

MA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMGN and MA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MA has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to AMGN (6.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMGN dropped -63.48% vs MA's -62.67%.

AMGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMGN and MA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer