AMFIX vs. SPUBX
AMFIX (AAMA Income Fund) and SPUBX (Symmetry Panoramic US Fixed Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, AMFIX returned 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SPUBX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMFIX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SPUBX.
Performance
AMFIX vs. SPUBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMFIX achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than SPUBX's 0.36% return.
AMFIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 2.53%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.75%
- 10Y*
- —
SPUBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- —
AMFIX vs. SPUBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund | 0.30% | 3.74% | 3.48% | 3.84% | -6.26% | -1.37% | 2.24% | 2.47% | 0.92% |
SPUBX Symmetry Panoramic US Fixed Income Fund | 0.36% | 7.23% | 1.15% | 5.32% | -9.45% | -1.72% | 5.63% | 5.91% | 1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMFIX and SPUBX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between AMFIX and SPUBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMFIX vs. SPUBX — Risk / Return Rank
AMFIX
SPUBX
AMFIX vs. SPUBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) and Symmetry Panoramic US Fixed Income Fund (SPUBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMFIX | SPUBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.27 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 1.96 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 5.86 | +5.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMFIX | SPUBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.45 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.15 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.48 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
AMFIX vs. SPUBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMFIX drawdown since its inception was -9.35%, smaller than the maximum SPUBX drawdown of -13.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMFIX and SPUBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMFIX | SPUBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -13.72% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.74% | -2.78% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.88% | -4.86% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.91% | -13.32% | +4.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -1.42% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -3.89% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 0.93% | -0.71% |
Volatility
AMFIX vs. SPUBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) is 0.41%, while Symmetry Panoramic US Fixed Income Fund (SPUBX) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that AMFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPUBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMFIX | SPUBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | 1.25% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.83% | 2.64% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04% | 3.77% | -2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.17% | 4.74% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.74% | 4.14% | -2.40% |
AMFIX vs. SPUBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMFIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUBX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMFIX vs. SPUBX - Dividend Comparison
AMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than SPUBX's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund | 2.21% | 2.08% | 2.44% | 1.70% | 0.83% | 0.57% | 0.83% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 0.40% |
SPUBX Symmetry Panoramic US Fixed Income Fund | 4.29% | 4.31% | 4.57% | 2.52% | 1.61% | 1.16% | 1.82% | 2.14% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMFIX and SPUBX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPUBX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to AMFIX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMFIX dropped -9.35% vs SPUBX's -13.72%.
AMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMFIX and SPUBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer