PortfoliosLab logo
CTA vs. AMFAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CTA and AMFAX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CTA vs. AMFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CTA:

0.35

AMFAX:

-2.04

Sortino Ratio

CTA:

0.32

AMFAX:

-2.74

Omega Ratio

CTA:

1.04

AMFAX:

0.64

Calmar Ratio

CTA:

0.20

AMFAX:

-0.78

Martin Ratio

CTA:

0.47

AMFAX:

-1.86

Ulcer Index

CTA:

4.25%

AMFAX:

15.36%

Daily Std Dev

CTA:

12.35%

AMFAX:

13.51%

Max Drawdown

CTA:

-18.07%

AMFAX:

-36.84%

Current Drawdown

CTA:

-9.76%

AMFAX:

-35.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTA achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly higher than AMFAX's -17.21% return.


CTA

YTD

-2.26%

1M

-0.59%

6M

1.60%

1Y

4.27%

3Y*

7.94%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AMFAX

YTD

-17.21%

1M

-0.42%

6M

-17.41%

1Y

-27.39%

3Y*

-9.81%

5Y*

2.27%

10Y*

0.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CTA vs. AMFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTA has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFAX's 1.72% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CTA vs. AMFAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTA is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTA is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTA is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTA is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTA is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTA is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMFAX is 00
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMFAX is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMFAX is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMFAX is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMFAX is 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMFAX is 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CTA vs. AMFAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the AMFAX Sharpe Ratio of -2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTA and AMFAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CTA vs. AMFAX - Dividend Comparison

CTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than AMFAX's 1.54% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
4.82%4.80%7.78%6.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AMFAX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
1.54%1.28%0.30%32.70%5.74%3.14%6.12%1.32%0.00%0.00%4.92%13.43%

Drawdowns

CTA vs. AMFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTA drawdown since its inception was -18.07%, smaller than the maximum AMFAX drawdown of -36.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTA and AMFAX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CTA vs. AMFAX - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) at 2.71%. This indicates that CTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...