AMFAX vs. RWSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMFAX (AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A) and RWSIX (Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 5 years, AMFAX returned 2.77%/yr vs 2.42%/yr for RWSIX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMFAX charges 1.72%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RWSIX.

Performance

AMFAX vs. RWSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) and Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMFAX achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly higher than RWSIX's 9.73% return.

AMFAX

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 15.09%
• 6M: 17.69%
• 1Y: 26.17%
• 3Y*: -1.66%
• 5Y*: 2.77%
• 10Y*: 2.64%

RWSIX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 9.73%
• 6M: 10.72%
• 1Y: 17.30%
• 3Y*: 3.69%
• 5Y*: 2.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMFAX vs. RWSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMFAX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A	15.09%	-9.75%	-3.56%	-10.59%	35.38%	3.28%	13.29%	8.03%	-12.87%	2.36%
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund	9.73%	-2.43%	-0.64%	8.92%	-6.10%	18.37%	22.40%	11.18%	-3.55%	-6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between AMFAX and RWSIX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017	0.24

Over the past year, AMFAX and RWSIX have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

AMFAX vs. RWSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMFAX

AMFAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
AMFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AMFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AMFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
AMFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AMFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

RWSIX

RWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 32
RWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
RWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
RWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
RWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
RWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMFAX vs. RWSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) and Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMFAX	RWSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	1.63	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	2.33	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.29	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.94	2.08	+2.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.65	7.63	+10.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMFAX vs. RWSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the RWSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMFAX and RWSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMFAX	RWSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18	1.63	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.20	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.45	-0.13

Drawdowns

AMFAX vs. RWSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMFAX drawdown since its inception was -36.84%, which is greater than RWSIX's maximum drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMFAX and RWSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMFAX	RWSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.84%	-24.90%	-11.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.17%	-8.37%	+3.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.49%	-24.90%	-5.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.84%	-24.90%	-11.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.94%	-8.67%	-10.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.63%	-6.81%	-6.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.45%	2.28%	-0.83%

Volatility

AMFAX vs. RWSIX - Volatility Comparison

AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) at 3.29%. This indicates that AMFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMFAX	RWSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	3.29%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.59%	8.36%	+1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.76%	10.69%	+1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.77%	12.19%	+1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.70%	12.29%	+0.41%

AMFAX vs. RWSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMFAX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than RWSIX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMFAX vs. RWSIX - Dividend Comparison

AMFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than RWSIX's 4.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMFAX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A	1.60%	1.84%	1.28%	0.30%	32.70%	5.74%	3.14%	4.71%	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%	4.92%
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund	4.11%	4.51%	0.00%	10.35%	3.41%	7.81%	7.78%	3.05%	2.51%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMFAX and RWSIX in my portfolio?

AMFAX and RWSIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMFAX or RWSIX?

AMFAX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to RWSIX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMFAX dropped -36.84% vs RWSIX's -24.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.