AMEM.DE vs. XMME.DE
AMEM.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, from Amundi and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMEM.DE returned 8.42%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AMEM.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
AMEM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEM.DE achieves a 27.34% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
AMEM.DE
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 27.34%
- 6M
- 29.35%
- 1Y
- 49.79%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 31.13%
- 1Y
- 51.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
AMEM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR | 27.34% | 19.31% | 13.70% | 5.24% | -13.78% | 3.95% | 6.30% | 21.51% | -11.20% | 7.47% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 21.91% | -11.16% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEM.DE and XMME.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 1.00 |
The correlation between AMEM.DE and XMME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEM.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEM.DE
XMME.DE
AMEM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.55 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 4.98 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.89 | 18.04 | -1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 3.00 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.51 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.45 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
AMEM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.87%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEM.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.87% | -31.96% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.65% | -10.67% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.22% | -19.16% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.53% | -24.38% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -1.04% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -9.53% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 2.95% | -0.01% |
Volatility
AMEM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) have volatilities of 7.41% and 7.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 7.48% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.02% | 14.90% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 17.70% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 16.74% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 18.61% | -0.33% |
AMEM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEM.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMEM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEM.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, AMEM.DE and XMME.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEM.DE.
Both ETFs track MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEM.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEM.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer