AMEL.DE vs. V3AA.DE
AMEL.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR) and V3AA.DE (Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEL.DE is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while V3AA.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Choice Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMEL.DE returned 9.48%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for V3AA.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMEL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for V3AA.DE.
Performance
AMEL.DE vs. V3AA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than V3AA.DE's 12.77% return.
AMEL.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -7.22%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 34.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.43%
V3AA.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 5.86%
- YTD
- 12.77%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- —
AMEL.DE vs. V3AA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 10.83% | 38.06% | -22.22% | 28.09% | 16.34% | 2.18% |
V3AA.DE Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 12.77% | 7.60% | 24.41% | 20.63% | -18.04% | 20.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEL.DE and V3AA.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEL.DE vs. V3AA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEL.DE
V3AA.DE
AMEL.DE vs. V3AA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (V3AA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEL.DE | V3AA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.30 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 13.32 | -3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEL.DE | V3AA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.17 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.78 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.82 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
AMEL.DE vs. V3AA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.69%, which is greater than V3AA.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and V3AA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEL.DE | V3AA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.69% | -22.30% | -30.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.86% | -8.16% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.38% | -22.30% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.38% | -22.30% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.86% | -0.75% | -10.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.89% | -5.91% | -11.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 2.03% | +1.54% |
Volatility
AMEL.DE vs. V3AA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (V3AA.DE) at 3.38%. This indicates that AMEL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V3AA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEL.DE | V3AA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 3.38% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.30% | 9.13% | +6.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 12.42% | +5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 14.42% | +6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.27% | 14.33% | +10.94% |
AMEL.DE vs. V3AA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than V3AA.DE's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMEL.DE vs. V3AA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEL.DE nor V3AA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEL.DE and V3AA.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for V3AA.DE.
AMEL.DE is categorized as Latin America Equities, while V3AA.DE is Global Equities. AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while V3AA.DE tracks FTSE Global All Cap Choice Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEL.DE and 0.24% for V3AA.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEL.DE and V3AA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer