PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMEL.DE vs. IS0X.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMEL.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IS0X.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 14.06% return, which is significantly higher than IS0X.DE's 3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE has outperformed IS0X.DE with an annualized return of 7.37%, while IS0X.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.82% annualized return.


AMEL.DE

1D
0.53%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
14.06%
6M
15.33%
1Y
38.03%
3Y*
10.73%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
7.37%

IS0X.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
2.18%
YTD
3.22%
6M
3.65%
1Y
6.15%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*
1.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMEL.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
14.06%38.05%-22.20%28.15%16.33%-3.25%-21.25%20.70%-3.30%8.15%
IS0X.DE
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
3.22%-2.16%7.10%5.53%-11.18%4.80%0.18%14.28%0.50%-4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AMEL.DE and IS0X.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2012

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMEL.DE vs. IS0X.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEL.DE
AMEL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

IS0X.DE
IS0X.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
IS0X.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0X.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0X.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0X.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0X.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEL.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IS0X.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMEL.DEIS0X.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.94

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.71

6.67

+2.04

AMEL.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the IS0X.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEL.DE and IS0X.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMEL.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.71%, which is greater than IS0X.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and IS0X.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMEL.DEIS0X.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.71%

-27.33%

-25.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-2.08%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.37%

-8.55%

-16.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-13.06%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

-17.31%

-34.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.25%

-1.24%

-7.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.85%

-9.98%

-7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

0.92%

+3.44%

Volatility

AMEL.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IS0X.DE) at 1.11%. This indicates that AMEL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS0X.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMEL.DEIS0X.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.42%

1.11%

+5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.64%

3.01%

+12.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.95%

4.44%

+14.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.03%

6.44%

+14.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.27%

8.31%

+16.96%

AMEL.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMEL.DE and IS0X.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AMEL.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Dividend Comparison

AMEL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IS0X.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IS0X.DE
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.16%4.22%3.80%3.35%2.65%2.03%2.45%2.68%2.59%2.64%2.57%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMEL.DE and IS0X.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMEL.DE and IS0X.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

AMEL.DE is categorized as Latin America Equities, while IS0X.DE is Global Corporate Bonds. AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while IS0X.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMEL.DE and IS0X.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer