AMEL.DE vs. EWT
AMEL.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR) and EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEL.DE is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while EWT is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE returned 8.05%/yr vs 19.18%/yr for EWT. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMEL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWT.
Performance
AMEL.DE vs. EWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AMEL.DE is traded in EUR, while EWT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EWT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 64.02% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 8.05%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.18% annualized return.
AMEL.DE
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 13.84%
- 6M
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- 37.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.05%
EWT
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 9.55%
- YTD
- 64.02%
- 6M
- 69.93%
- 1Y
- 89.50%
- 3Y*
- 31.88%
- 5Y*
- 18.56%
- 10Y*
- 19.18%
AMEL.DE vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 13.84% | 38.05% | -22.20% | 28.15% | 16.33% | -3.25% | -21.25% | 20.70% | -3.30% | 8.15% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 64.02% | 13.14% | 23.78% | 20.25% | -24.49% | 35.62% | 20.66% | 36.37% | -5.67% | 11.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEL.DE and EWT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2011 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEL.DE vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank
AMEL.DE
EWT
AMEL.DE vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMEL.DE | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.59 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 10.85 | -8.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.36 | 28.55 | -19.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMEL.DE vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.71%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -57.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and EWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEL.DE | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.71% | -57.02% | +4.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.17% | -8.29% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.37% | -27.84% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -31.06% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | -31.06% | -20.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.43% | -3.76% | -4.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.87% | -11.37% | -6.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 3.15% | +0.85% |
Volatility
AMEL.DE vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) is 6.66%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 12.70%. This indicates that AMEL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEL.DE | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 12.70% | -6.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.86% | 21.13% | -5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 25.46% | -6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.00% | 21.63% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.29% | 21.07% | +4.22% |
AMEL.DE vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMEL.DE vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison
AMEL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 2.74% | 4.43% | 3.32% | 8.12% | 18.82% | 0.55% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEL.DE and EWT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.
AMEL.DE is categorized as Latin America Equities, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEL.DE and 0.59% for EWT.
Find the right allocation for AMEL.DE and EWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer