PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMEL.DE vs. ALAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMEL.DE vs. ALAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AMEL.DE is traded in EUR, while ALAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ALAG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than ALAG.L's 11.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AMEL.DE having a 7.43% annualized return and ALAG.L not far ahead at 7.46%.


AMEL.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
-7.22%
YTD
10.83%
6M
8.65%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
7.43%

ALAG.L

1D
-0.56%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
11.54%
6M
9.06%
1Y
35.05%
3Y*
10.80%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
7.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMEL.DE vs. ALAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
10.83%38.06%-22.22%28.09%16.34%-3.21%-21.29%20.69%-3.27%8.15%
ALAG.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD
11.54%36.78%-21.71%27.75%15.46%-2.27%-21.09%19.93%-2.93%7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between AMEL.DE and ALAG.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.93

The correlation between AMEL.DE and ALAG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMEL.DE vs. ALAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEL.DE
AMEL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ALAG.L
ALAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEL.DE vs. ALAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMEL.DEALAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.41

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

10.06

-0.40

AMEL.DE vs. ALAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEL.DE and ALAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMEL.DEALAG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.97

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.46

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.30

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.35

-0.23

Drawdowns

AMEL.DE vs. ALAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.69%, roughly equal to the maximum ALAG.L drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and ALAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMEL.DEALAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.69%

-50.97%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.86%

-10.22%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.38%

-24.17%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.38%

-24.17%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.31%

-50.97%

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.86%

-10.22%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.89%

-11.32%

-6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.47%

+0.10%

Volatility

AMEL.DE vs. ALAG.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) at 4.99%. This indicates that AMEL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMEL.DEALAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

4.99%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

15.37%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.10%

17.72%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.90%

20.85%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.27%

25.26%

+0.01%

AMEL.DE vs. ALAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ALAG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AMEL.DE vs. ALAG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMEL.DE nor ALAG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AMEL.DE and ALAG.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ALAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ALAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEL.DE.

AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while ALAG.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEL.DE and 0.10% for ALAG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMEL.DE and ALAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer