AMEG.L vs. UC79.L
AMEG.L (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) and UC79.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from Amundi and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMEG.L returned 12.91%/yr vs 24.35%/yr for UC79.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMEG.L charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for UC79.L.
Performance
AMEG.L vs. UC79.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEG.L achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly lower than UC79.L's 33.24% return.
AMEG.L
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 34.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UC79.L
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 8.63%
- YTD
- 33.24%
- 6M
- 35.28%
- 1Y
- 64.62%
- 3Y*
- 24.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
AMEG.L vs. UC79.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEG.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 15.84% | 19.33% | 6.23% | -5.48% | -1.10% |
UC79.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 33.24% | 26.95% | 10.88% | 1.14% | -3.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEG.L and UC79.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between AMEG.L and UC79.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEG.L vs. UC79.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMEG.L
UC79.L
AMEG.L vs. UC79.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (AMEG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEG.L | UC79.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.57 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 2.48 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.17 | 4.47 | +6.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEG.L | UC79.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 1.44 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.15 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
AMEG.L vs. UC79.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum UC79.L drawdown of -53.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEG.L and UC79.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEG.L | UC79.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -53.04% | +34.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -25.91% | +16.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | -25.91% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -2.45% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -21.80% | +15.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 14.42% | -11.31% |
Volatility
AMEG.L vs. UC79.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (AMEG.L) is 6.11%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that AMEG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC79.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEG.L | UC79.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 8.44% | -2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 15.21% | -2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 44.59% | -28.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 24.99% | -9.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 25.01% | -9.36% |
AMEG.L vs. UC79.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEG.L has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than UC79.L's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMEG.L vs. UC79.L - Dividend Comparison
AMEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than UC79.L's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEG.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 1.72% | 1.99% | 2.06% | 2.38% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC79.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.59% | 2.14% | 1.79% | 2.38% | 2.06% | 1.35% | 1.81% | 2.11% | 2.11% | 1.97% | 2.15% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, AMEG.L and UC79.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AMEG.L is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEG.L is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for UC79.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for AMEG.L and 0.27% for UC79.L.
Find the right allocation for AMEG.L and UC79.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer