AMEG.L vs. E127.L
AMEG.L (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) and E127.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Amundi tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMEG.L returned 12.91%/yr vs 21.77%/yr for E127.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMEG.L charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for E127.L.
Performance
AMEG.L vs. E127.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AMEG.L is traded in GBp, while E127.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the E127.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEG.L achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly lower than E127.L's 26.18% return.
AMEG.L
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 34.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
E127.L
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 6.35%
- YTD
- 26.18%
- 6M
- 28.72%
- 1Y
- 54.75%
- 3Y*
- 21.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- —
AMEG.L vs. E127.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEG.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 15.84% | 19.33% | 6.23% | -5.48% | -1.10% |
E127.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist | 26.18% | 25.81% | 10.12% | 3.48% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEG.L and E127.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between AMEG.L and E127.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEG.L vs. E127.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMEG.L
E127.L
AMEG.L vs. E127.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (AMEG.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEG.L | E127.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.60 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 5.04 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.17 | 18.09 | -6.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEG.L | E127.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 3.25 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.74 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
AMEG.L vs. E127.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum E127.L drawdown of -26.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEG.L and E127.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEG.L | E127.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -26.68% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -10.82% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | -15.31% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -2.33% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -10.34% | +3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.02% | +0.09% |
Volatility
AMEG.L vs. E127.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (AMEG.L) is 6.11%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that AMEG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than E127.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEG.L | E127.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 7.32% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 14.30% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 16.79% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 16.18% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 16.39% | -0.74% |
AMEG.L vs. E127.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEG.L has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than E127.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMEG.L vs. E127.L - Dividend Comparison
AMEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than E127.L's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEG.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 1.72% | 1.99% | 2.06% | 2.38% | 1.29% | 0.00% |
E127.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist | 1.96% | 2.47% | 4.04% | 4.40% | 2.79% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, AMEG.L and E127.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, E127.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
E127.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for AMEG.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for AMEG.L and 0.14% for E127.L.
Find the right allocation for AMEG.L and E127.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer