AMEG.L vs. MWRD.L
AMEG.L (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEG.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while MWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMEG.L charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for MWRD.L.
Performance
AMEG.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AMEG.L
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 34.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MWRD.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMEG.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEG.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 15.84% | 19.33% | 6.23% | -5.48% | -1.10% |
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World | 0.00% | 0.00% | -1.27% | 17.50% | 5.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEG.L and MWRD.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022 | 0.31 |
The correlation between AMEG.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEG.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMEG.L
MWRD.L
AMEG.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (AMEG.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEG.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEG.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | — | — |
Drawdowns
AMEG.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEG.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | — | — |
Volatility
AMEG.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEG.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.65% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | — | — |
AMEG.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEG.L has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMEG.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
AMEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, while MWRD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEG.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 1.72% | 1.99% | 2.06% | 2.38% | 1.29% |
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEG.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for AMEG.L.
AMEG.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. AMEG.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for AMEG.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for AMEG.L and MWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer