AMEE.DE vs. LYTR.DE
AMEE.DE (Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and LYTR.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEE.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG, while LYTR.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEE.DE returned 15.00%/yr vs 7.78%/yr for LYTR.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMEE.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LYTR.DE.
Performance
AMEE.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEE.DE achieves a 25.34% return, which is significantly higher than LYTR.DE's 18.70% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEE.DE has outperformed LYTR.DE with an annualized return of 15.00%, while LYTR.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.78% annualized return.
AMEE.DE
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 25.34%
- 6M
- 26.10%
- 1Y
- 59.52%
- 3Y*
- 32.29%
- 5Y*
- 27.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
LYTR.DE
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- 18.70%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- 1Y
- 45.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 14.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
AMEE.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEE.DE Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 25.34% | 37.58% | 15.56% | 12.19% | 35.81% | 34.64% | -31.29% | 10.32% | -0.78% | 5.51% |
LYTR.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 18.70% | 17.59% | 13.34% | -15.11% | 27.02% | 52.42% | -19.47% | 14.16% | -6.16% | -11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEE.DE and LYTR.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2010 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMEE.DE and LYTR.DE has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEE.DE vs. LYTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEE.DE
LYTR.DE
AMEE.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) and Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMEE.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.35 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.46 | 3.27 | +3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.23 | 11.51 | +8.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMEE.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEE.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, smaller than the maximum LYTR.DE drawdown of -67.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEE.DE and LYTR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEE.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.14% | -67.76% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -13.95% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.74% | -17.04% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -30.28% | +11.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.14% | -44.61% | -14.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.42% | -13.23% | +7.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.42% | -32.82% | +22.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 3.97% | -1.04% |
Volatility
AMEE.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) at 4.59%. This indicates that AMEE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYTR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEE.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 4.59% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.61% | 20.59% | -5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.39% | 22.63% | -3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 19.46% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 18.36% | +7.23% |
AMEE.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEE.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LYTR.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMEE.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEE.DE nor LYTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEE.DE and LYTR.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYTR.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYTR.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AMEE.DE.
AMEE.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while LYTR.DE is Commodities. AMEE.DE tracks Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG, while LYTR.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AMEE.DE and 0.30% for LYTR.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEE.DE and LYTR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer