AMED.DE vs. SELD.DE
AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and SELD.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30 UCITS ETF Dist) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while SELD.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe Select Dividend 30. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE returned 9.75%/yr vs 9.59%/yr for SELD.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMED.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SELD.DE.
Performance
AMED.DE vs. SELD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than SELD.DE's 14.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AMED.DE having a 9.75% annualized return and SELD.DE not far behind at 9.59%.
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
SELD.DE
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 32.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
AMED.DE vs. SELD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
SELD.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30 UCITS ETF Dist | 14.08% | 44.46% | 5.76% | 3.90% | -10.09% | 24.12% | -9.44% | 27.63% | -4.88% | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMED.DE and SELD.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.82 |
The correlation between AMED.DE and SELD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMED.DE vs. SELD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMED.DE
SELD.DE
AMED.DE vs. SELD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30 UCITS ETF Dist (SELD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMED.DE | SELD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.49 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 4.79 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 16.20 | -6.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMED.DE | SELD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.73 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.75 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.55 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.18 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
AMED.DE vs. SELD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum SELD.DE drawdown of -70.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and SELD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMED.DE | SELD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -70.30% | +31.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -6.72% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -14.13% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -23.02% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | -40.65% | +2.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -1.80% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -25.32% | +18.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 1.99% | +0.82% |
Volatility
AMED.DE vs. SELD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Lyxor STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30 UCITS ETF Dist (SELD.DE) at 3.83%. This indicates that AMED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SELD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMED.DE | SELD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 3.83% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 9.59% | +3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 11.81% | +3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 14.87% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 17.42% | -0.42% |
AMED.DE vs. SELD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMED.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SELD.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMED.DE vs. SELD.DE - Dividend Comparison
AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SELD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SELD.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30 UCITS ETF Dist | 5.68% | 6.48% | 6.46% | 0.00% | 7.70% | 4.52% | 5.09% | 5.34% | 5.60% | 4.75% | 5.20% | 5.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMED.DE and SELD.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SELD.DE.
AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while SELD.DE tracks STOXX® Europe Select Dividend 30. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMED.DE and 0.30% for SELD.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMED.DE and SELD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer