AMED.DE vs. S6X0.DE
AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and S6X0.DE (Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while S6X0.DE tracks the EURO STOXX 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE returned 9.75%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for S6X0.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMED.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for S6X0.DE.
Performance
AMED.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than S6X0.DE's 7.30% return. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE has underperformed S6X0.DE with an annualized return of 9.75%, while S6X0.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.39% annualized return.
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
S6X0.DE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 15.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
AMED.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
S6X0.DE Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Dist | 7.30% | 22.02% | 10.94% | 22.42% | -8.98% | 23.10% | -3.21% | 30.30% | -13.84% | 12.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMED.DE and S6X0.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, AMED.DE and S6X0.DE have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.63, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMED.DE vs. S6X0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMED.DE
S6X0.DE
AMED.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Dist (S6X0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMED.DE | S6X0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.44 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 4.89 | +4.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMED.DE | S6X0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 0.98 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.63 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.51 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
AMED.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, roughly equal to the maximum S6X0.DE drawdown of -38.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and S6X0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMED.DE | S6X0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -38.54% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -10.88% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -16.56% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -23.41% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | -38.54% | +0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.51% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -6.82% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.21% | -0.40% |
Volatility
AMED.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Dist (S6X0.DE) at 4.96%. This indicates that AMED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than S6X0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMED.DE | S6X0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 4.96% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 12.92% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 15.93% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 17.56% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 20.60% | -3.60% |
AMED.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMED.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than S6X0.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMED.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Dividend Comparison
AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while S6X0.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
S6X0.DE Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Dist | 2.78% | 2.99% | 3.38% | 3.17% | 3.10% | 2.47% | 2.53% | 3.48% | 3.69% | 2.92% | 3.18% | 3.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, AMED.DE and S6X0.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, S6X0.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S6X0.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while S6X0.DE tracks EURO STOXX 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMED.DE and 0.05% for S6X0.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMED.DE and S6X0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer