AMED.DE vs. PR1E.DE
AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and PR1E.DE (Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while PR1E.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Europe Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMED.DE returned 10.41%/yr vs 10.02%/yr for PR1E.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMED.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PR1E.DE.
Performance
AMED.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than PR1E.DE's 7.72% return.
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
PR1E.DE
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 10.21%
- 1Y
- 17.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- —
AMED.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 14.59% |
PR1E.DE Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D) | 7.72% | 20.48% | 8.42% | 15.89% | -9.34% | 25.39% | -3.59% | 15.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMED.DE and PR1E.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between AMED.DE and PR1E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMED.DE vs. PR1E.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMED.DE
PR1E.DE
AMED.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMED.DE | PR1E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.25 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.81 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 6.80 | +2.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMED.DE | PR1E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.32 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.68 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.62 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
AMED.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than PR1E.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and PR1E.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMED.DE | PR1E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -35.98% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -9.39% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -16.84% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -19.66% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -1.61% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -4.90% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 2.51% | +0.30% |
Volatility
AMED.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1E.DE) at 4.33%. This indicates that AMED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMED.DE | PR1E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 4.33% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 10.60% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 12.88% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 14.48% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 16.68% | +0.32% |
AMED.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMED.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1E.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMED.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Dividend Comparison
AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1E.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PR1E.DE Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D) | 2.38% | 2.56% | 2.87% | 2.91% | 3.15% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 2.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, AMED.DE and PR1E.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PR1E.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1E.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while PR1E.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Europe Large & Mid Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMED.DE and 0.05% for PR1E.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMED.DE and PR1E.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer