AMED.DE vs. EXS2.DE
AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and EXS2.DE (iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE)) are both Europe Equities funds - AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while EXS2.DE tracks the TecDAX®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE returned 9.75%/yr vs 9.01%/yr for EXS2.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMED.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for EXS2.DE.
Performance
AMED.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than EXS2.DE's 15.70% return. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE has outperformed EXS2.DE with an annualized return of 9.75%, while EXS2.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.01% annualized return.
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
EXS2.DE
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 10.51%
- YTD
- 15.70%
- 6M
- 16.91%
- 1Y
- 6.46%
- 3Y*
- 8.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
AMED.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
EXS2.DE iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE) | 15.70% | 5.33% | 1.63% | 13.54% | -26.00% | 21.07% | 6.12% | 22.25% | -3.77% | 39.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMED.DE and EXS2.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.73 |
The correlation between AMED.DE and EXS2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMED.DE vs. EXS2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMED.DE
EXS2.DE
AMED.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMED.DE | EXS2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.07 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 0.40 | +2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 0.80 | +8.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMED.DE | EXS2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 0.36 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.20 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.46 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.14 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
AMED.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum EXS2.DE drawdown of -84.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and EXS2.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMED.DE | EXS2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -84.49% | +46.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -16.12% | +5.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -17.93% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -34.97% | +10.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | -34.97% | -3.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.81% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -39.46% | +32.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 8.07% | -5.26% |
Volatility
AMED.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS2.DE) at 5.29%. This indicates that AMED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXS2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMED.DE | EXS2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 5.29% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 14.25% | -1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 17.83% | -2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 18.80% | -2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 19.47% | -2.47% |
AMED.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMED.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EXS2.DE's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMED.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMED.DE nor EXS2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EXS2.DE iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMED.DE and EXS2.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EXS2.DE.
AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while EXS2.DE tracks TecDAX®. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMED.DE and 0.51% for EXS2.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMED.DE and EXS2.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer