AMED.DE vs. EUPA.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and EUPA.DE (Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD)) are both Europe Equities funds - AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while EUPA.DE tracks the Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMED.DE returned 16.11%/yr vs 17.95%/yr for EUPA.DE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMED.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EUPA.DE.

Performance

AMED.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than EUPA.DE's 8.36% return.

AMED.DE

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 16.87%
• 6M: 18.54%
• 1Y: 26.45%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 10.41%
• 10Y*: 9.75%

EUPA.DE

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 8.36%
• 6M: 9.94%
• 1Y: 17.10%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMED.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)	16.87%	20.15%	5.95%	5.72%
EUPA.DE Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD)	8.36%	18.38%	13.54%	11.13%

Correlation

The correlation between AMED.DE and EUPA.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023	0.67

The correlation between AMED.DE and EUPA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMED.DE vs. EUPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMED.DE

AMED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 53
AMED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
AMED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
AMED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
AMED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
AMED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55

EUPA.DE

EUPA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 45
EUPA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
EUPA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
EUPA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 45
EUPA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
EUPA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMED.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMED.DE	EUPA.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.57	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	2.27	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.28	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	2.02	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.40	7.49	+1.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMED.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMED.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the EUPA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMED.DE and EUPA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMED.DE	EUPA.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.57	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	1.30	-0.84

Drawdowns

AMED.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than EUPA.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and EUPA.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMED.DE	EUPA.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.35%	-10.28%	-28.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.56%	-8.44%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.07%	-10.28%	-3.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-2.77%	+2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-1.91%	-4.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	2.28%	+0.53%

Volatility

AMED.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE) at 3.63%. This indicates that AMED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUPA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMED.DE	EUPA.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	3.63%	+1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.64%	9.03%	+3.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.19%	10.84%	+4.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.87%	12.40%	+3.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	12.40%	+4.60%

AMED.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMED.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EUPA.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMED.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMED.DE nor EUPA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMED.DE and EUPA.DE in my portfolio?

AMED.DE and EUPA.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMED.DE or EUPA.DE?

On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMED.DE or EUPA.DE?

AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EUPA.DE.

What is the main difference between AMED.DE and EUPA.DE?

AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while EUPA.DE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMED.DE and 0.65% for EUPA.DE.