AMED.DE vs. EUN0.DE
AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and EUN0.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while EUN0.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE returned 9.75%/yr vs 6.66%/yr for EUN0.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
AMED.DE vs. EUN0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than EUN0.DE's 5.60% return. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE has outperformed EUN0.DE with an annualized return of 9.75%, while EUN0.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.66% annualized return.
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
EUN0.DE
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- 10.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.66%
AMED.DE vs. EUN0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
EUN0.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 5.60% | 12.27% | 11.42% | 10.79% | -13.21% | 21.54% | -4.02% | 24.17% | -4.36% | 9.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMED.DE and EUN0.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2013 | 0.82 |
The correlation between AMED.DE and EUN0.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMED.DE vs. EUN0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMED.DE
EUN0.DE
AMED.DE vs. EUN0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUN0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMED.DE | EUN0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.11 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 0.76 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 1.97 | +7.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMED.DE | EUN0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 0.62 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.66 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.53 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.63 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
AMED.DE vs. EUN0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than EUN0.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and EUN0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMED.DE | EUN0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -30.68% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -7.16% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -10.73% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -19.64% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | -30.68% | -7.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -3.12% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -4.69% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 2.76% | +0.05% |
Volatility
AMED.DE vs. EUN0.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUN0.DE) at 3.03%. This indicates that AMED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUN0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMED.DE | EUN0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 3.03% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 7.20% | +5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 8.77% | +6.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 11.02% | +4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 12.51% | +4.49% |
AMED.DE vs. EUN0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMED.DE and EUN0.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMED.DE vs. EUN0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMED.DE nor EUN0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMED.DE and EUN0.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE and EUN0.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while EUN0.DE tracks MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.
Find the right allocation for AMED.DE and EUN0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer