AMED.DE vs. DBXS.DE
AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and DBXS.DE (Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Europe Equities funds - AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while DBXS.DE tracks the Solactive Swiss Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMED.DE returned 10.77%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for DBXS.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMED.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DBXS.DE.
Performance
AMED.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly higher than DBXS.DE's 10.18% return.
AMED.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- YTD
- 18.14%
- 1Y
- 28.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- —
DBXS.DE
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 23.16%
- 3Y*
- 11.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
AMED.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 18.14% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | -1.09% |
DBXS.DE Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) | 10.18% | 19.12% | 3.77% | 10.63% | -11.87% | 28.73% | 1.61% | 35.45% | -4.24% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMED.DE and DBXS.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017 | 0.51 |
The correlation between AMED.DE and DBXS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMED.DE vs. DBXS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMED.DE
DBXS.DE
AMED.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMED.DE | DBXS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 1.91 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.34 | 6.57 | +3.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMED.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum DBXS.DE drawdown of -48.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and DBXS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMED.DE | DBXS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -48.29% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -12.05% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -14.48% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -17.19% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -1.37% | -1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -8.72% | +3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 3.51% | -0.78% |
Volatility
AMED.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMED.DE | DBXS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.74% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 10.88% | +2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 13.80% | +1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 13.40% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 13.99% | +3.35% |
AMED.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMED.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBXS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMED.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Dividend Comparison
AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBXS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBXS.DE Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 3.25% | 1.20% | 1.59% | 1.21% | 2.35% | 1.32% | 1.06% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMED.DE and DBXS.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXS.DE.
AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while DBXS.DE tracks Solactive Swiss Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMED.DE and 0.30% for DBXS.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMED.DE and DBXS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer