AMED.DE vs. D5BL.DE
AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and D5BL.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while D5BL.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE returned 9.75%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for D5BL.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMED.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for D5BL.DE.
Performance
AMED.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than D5BL.DE's 13.85% return. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE has underperformed D5BL.DE with an annualized return of 9.75%, while D5BL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.77% annualized return.
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
D5BL.DE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- 13.85%
- 6M
- 17.13%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
AMED.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
D5BL.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF | 13.85% | 35.78% | 10.37% | 14.14% | -4.63% | 26.83% | -8.58% | 22.90% | -13.98% | 9.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMED.DE and D5BL.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2010 | 0.89 |
The correlation between AMED.DE and D5BL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMED.DE vs. D5BL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMED.DE
D5BL.DE
AMED.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (D5BL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMED.DE | D5BL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 3.28 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 12.52 | -3.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMED.DE | D5BL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.28 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.93 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.60 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.48 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
AMED.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum D5BL.DE drawdown of -40.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and D5BL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMED.DE | D5BL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -40.40% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -10.02% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -17.36% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -19.58% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | -40.40% | +2.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -1.22% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -7.23% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 2.63% | +0.18% |
Volatility
AMED.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (D5BL.DE) at 4.83%. This indicates that AMED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than D5BL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMED.DE | D5BL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 4.83% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 11.54% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 14.44% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 15.59% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 17.76% | -0.76% |
AMED.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMED.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than D5BL.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMED.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMED.DE nor D5BL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMED.DE and D5BL.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, D5BL.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
D5BL.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while D5BL.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMED.DE and 0.15% for D5BL.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMED.DE and D5BL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer