AMED.DE vs. B41J.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and B41J.DE (Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating) are both Europe Equities funds - AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while B41J.DE tracks the Mirae Asset European Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AMED.DE returned 26.45% vs 8.84% for B41J.DE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMED.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for B41J.DE.

Performance

AMED.DE vs. B41J.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (B41J.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than B41J.DE's 7.25% return.

AMED.DE

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 16.87%
• 6M: 18.54%
• 1Y: 26.45%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 10.41%
• 10Y*: 9.75%

B41J.DE

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.79%
• YTD: 7.25%
• 6M: 8.32%
• 1Y: 8.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMED.DE vs. B41J.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)	16.87%	20.15%	-0.20%
B41J.DE Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating	7.25%	27.74%	-2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between AMED.DE and B41J.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024	0.65

The correlation between AMED.DE and B41J.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMED.DE vs. B41J.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMED.DE

AMED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 53
AMED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
AMED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
AMED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
AMED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
AMED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55

B41J.DE

B41J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 20
B41J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
B41J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
B41J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 18
B41J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
B41J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMED.DE vs. B41J.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (B41J.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMED.DE	B41J.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	0.58	+1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	0.90	+1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.11	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	0.94	+1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.40	2.70	+6.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMED.DE vs. B41J.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMED.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the B41J.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMED.DE and B41J.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMED.DE	B41J.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	0.58	+1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	1.12	-0.66

Drawdowns

AMED.DE vs. B41J.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than B41J.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and B41J.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMED.DE	B41J.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.35%	-12.00%	-26.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.56%	-9.34%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-4.55%	+4.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-2.45%	-4.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	3.24%	-0.43%

Volatility

AMED.DE vs. B41J.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (B41J.DE) at 4.95%. This indicates that AMED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than B41J.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMED.DE	B41J.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	4.95%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.64%	12.73%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.19%	15.27%	-0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.87%	16.11%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	16.11%	+0.89%

AMED.DE vs. B41J.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMED.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than B41J.DE's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMED.DE vs. B41J.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMED.DE nor B41J.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMED.DE and B41J.DE in my portfolio?

AMED.DE and B41J.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMED.DE or B41J.DE?

On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMED.DE or B41J.DE?

AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for B41J.DE.

What is the main difference between AMED.DE and B41J.DE?

AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while B41J.DE tracks Mirae Asset European Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMED.DE and 0.47% for B41J.DE.