AMEA.DE vs. 18MM.DE
AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) and 18MM.DE (Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Amundi - AMEA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while 18MM.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI Filtered PAB. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEA.DE returned 11.07%/yr vs 4.46%/yr for 18MM.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMEA.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for 18MM.DE.
Performance
AMEA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEA.DE achieves a 31.99% return, which is significantly higher than 18MM.DE's 2.24% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEA.DE has outperformed 18MM.DE with an annualized return of 11.07%, while 18MM.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.46% annualized return.
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 31.99%
- 6M
- 32.57%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
18MM.DE
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -5.29%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 0.13%
- 3Y*
- 2.40%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 4.46%
AMEA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 31.99% | 18.01% | 18.95% | 3.12% | -15.34% | 1.62% | 15.62% | 22.11% | -12.33% | 25.47% |
18MM.DE Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR | 2.24% | 0.05% | 5.93% | 1.38% | -7.30% | 14.57% | -5.45% | 21.40% | -6.44% | 10.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEA.DE and 18MM.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2011 | 0.63 |
The correlation between AMEA.DE and 18MM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.68 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEA.DE vs. 18MM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEA.DE
18MM.DE
AMEA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR (18MM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEA.DE | 18MM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.02 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 0.17 | +4.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.16 | 0.42 | +16.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEA.DE | 18MM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 0.08 | +2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.10 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.27 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.30 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
AMEA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.43%, smaller than the maximum 18MM.DE drawdown of -36.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEA.DE and 18MM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEA.DE | 18MM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.43% | -36.82% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -6.51% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.48% | -18.52% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.78% | -22.20% | -6.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | -36.82% | +3.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -5.39% | +2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -7.83% | -3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 2.58% | +0.63% |
Volatility
AMEA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR (18MM.DE) at 3.57%. This indicates that AMEA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 18MM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEA.DE | 18MM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 3.57% | +4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | 10.29% | +5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.29% | 13.51% | +5.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 14.97% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 16.60% | +2.37% |
AMEA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than 18MM.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMEA.DE vs. 18MM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEA.DE nor 18MM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEA.DE and 18MM.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for 18MM.DE.
AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while 18MM.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI Filtered PAB. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEA.DE and 0.45% for 18MM.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEA.DE and 18MM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer