AMDY vs. APRW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW).

AMDY and APRW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMDY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Sep 18, 2023. APRW is an actively managed fund by Allianz. It was launched on May 28, 2020.

Performance

AMDY vs. APRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMDY vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	-4.00%	53.93%	-17.00%	26.24%
APRW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF	1.48%	6.18%	11.25%	4.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDY achieves a -4.00% return, which is significantly lower than APRW's 1.48% return.

AMDY

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: 8.22%
• YTD: -4.00%
• 6M: 19.89%
• 1Y: 68.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRW

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 3.35%
• 1Y: 10.24%
• 3Y*: 9.39%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDY vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than APRW's 0.74% expense ratio.

AMDY

YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF

APRW

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF

Return for Risk

AMDY vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 71
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 72
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 54

APRW

APRW Risk / Return Rank: 84
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 96
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDY vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMDY	APRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.49	-0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.20	-0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.51	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	1.93	+0.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.49	13.27	-7.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMDY vs. APRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the APRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDY and APRW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMDY	APRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	1.49	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	1.04	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between AMDY and APRW is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMDY vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison

AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.96%, while APRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	94.96%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
APRW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.67%

Drawdowns

AMDY vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDY drawdown since its inception was -53.92%, which is greater than APRW's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDY and APRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDY	APRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.92%	-9.61%	-44.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.59%	-5.62%	-21.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.55%	0.00%	-18.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.00%	-1.15%	-17.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.58%	0.82%	+11.76%

Volatility

AMDY vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a higher volatility of 11.82% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) at 0.71%. This indicates that AMDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDY	APRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.82%	0.71%	+11.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.68%	1.60%	+39.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.27%	6.93%	+45.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.79%	6.73%	+37.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.79%	6.47%	+37.32%