AMDWX vs. FPADX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMDWX (Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund) and FPADX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, AMDWX returned 8.56%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for FPADX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMDWX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FPADX.

Performance

AMDWX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDWX achieves a 28.05% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 30.04% return. Over the past 10 years, AMDWX has underperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 8.56%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.42% annualized return.

AMDWX

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: 8.82%
• YTD: 28.05%
• 6M: 31.13%
• 1Y: 55.13%
• 3Y*: 20.38%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: 8.56%

FPADX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 10.70%
• YTD: 30.04%
• 6M: 32.95%
• 1Y: 58.94%
• 3Y*: 24.97%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDWX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMDWX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund	28.05%	19.97%	6.93%	13.25%	-17.60%	7.31%	21.26%	18.68%	-15.56%	21.39%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	30.04%	33.90%	6.80%	9.51%	-20.06%	-3.07%	17.84%	18.28%	-14.65%	35.16%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDWX and FPADX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011	0.84

The correlation between AMDWX and FPADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMDWX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDWX

AMDWX Risk / Return Rank: 91
AMDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AMDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
AMDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
AMDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AMDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FPADX

FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDWX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMDWX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.31	3.34	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.24	4.23	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.62	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.93	4.48	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.41	17.77	+0.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMDWX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDWX Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDWX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMDWX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.31	3.34	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.47	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.59	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.37	+0.01

Drawdowns

AMDWX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDWX drawdown since its inception was -28.88%, smaller than the maximum FPADX drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDWX and FPADX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDWX	FPADX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.88%	-39.16%	+10.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.36%	-13.28%	+1.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.18%	-16.09%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.01%	-37.00%	+9.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.42%	-39.16%	+11.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.00%	-13.26%	+4.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	3.34%	-0.30%

Volatility

AMDWX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) have volatilities of 7.56% and 7.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDWX	FPADX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	7.57%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.69%	15.40%	-0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.95%	17.80%	-0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.03%	17.11%	-3.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.09%	17.82%	-3.73%

AMDWX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDWX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDWX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

AMDWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than FPADX's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMDWX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund	2.19%	2.80%	0.58%	0.91%	1.03%	1.16%	0.00%	0.37%	0.50%	0.18%	0.28%	0.58%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	1.81%	2.35%	2.70%	2.68%	2.47%	2.14%	1.50%	2.59%	2.20%	0.12%	1.69%	2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDWX and FPADX in my portfolio?

AMDWX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMDWX or FPADX?

FPADX has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to AMDWX (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDWX dropped -28.88% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FPADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 3.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.