AMDI.L vs. WINC.L
AMDI.L (IncomeShares AMD Options ETP) and WINC.L (iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - AMDI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while WINC.L is a Dividend fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMDI.L returned 109.40% vs 21.03% for WINC.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMDI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WINC.L.
Performance
AMDI.L vs. WINC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AMDI.L is traded in USD, while WINC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WINC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMDI.L achieves a 90.23% return, which is significantly higher than WINC.L's 9.65% return.
AMDI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- 6M
- 75.66%
- YTD
- 90.23%
- 1Y
- 109.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WINC.L
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- YTD
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 21.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDI.L vs. WINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP | 90.23% | 12,701.59% |
WINC.L iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.65% | 10.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDI.L and WINC.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDI.L vs. WINC.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMDI.L
WINC.L
AMDI.L vs. WINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMDI.L | WINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.00 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | 12.99 | -9.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMDI.L vs. WINC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDI.L drawdown since its inception was -47.34%, which is greater than WINC.L's maximum drawdown of -15.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDI.L and WINC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDI.L | WINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.34% | -15.16% | -32.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.34% | -6.98% | -40.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.02% | -1.83% | -11.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.05% | -1.47% | -19.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.78% | 1.62% | +26.16% |
Volatility
AMDI.L vs. WINC.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) has a higher volatility of 25.29% compared to iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINC.L) at 3.54%. This indicates that AMDI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDI.L | WINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.29% | 3.54% | +21.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.91% | 8.59% | +38.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.12% | 10.94% | +64.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9,768.88% | 12.65% | +9,756.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9,768.88% | 12.65% | +9,756.23% |
AMDI.L vs. WINC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMDI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than WINC.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMDI.L vs. WINC.L - Dividend Comparison
AMDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.60%, more than WINC.L's 9.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP | 50.60% | 8.85% | 0.00% |
WINC.L iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.95% | 9.75% | 4.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDI.L and WINC.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WINC.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WINC.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AMDI.L.
AMDI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while WINC.L is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AMDI.L and 0.35% for WINC.L.
Find the right allocation for AMDI.L and WINC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer