PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDI.L vs. AAPI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDI.L vs. AAPI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP (AAPI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AMDI.L is traded in USD, while AAPI.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AAPI.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDI.L achieves a 116.03% return, which is significantly higher than AAPI.L's 2.89% return.


AMDI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.13%
6M
109.68%
YTD
116.03%
1Y
141.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAPI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
3.60%
6M
7.94%
YTD
2.89%
1Y
13.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDI.L vs. AAPI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMDI.L
IncomeShares AMD Options ETP
116.03%12,701.59%
AAPI.L
IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP
2.89%7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDI.L and AAPI.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDI.L vs. AAPI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDI.L
AMDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AMDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPI.L
AAPI.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
AAPI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDI.L vs. AAPI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP (AAPI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMDI.LAAPI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.17

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

0.36

+2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.10

0.56

+4.53

AMDI.L vs. AAPI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the AAPI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDI.L and AAPI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMDI.L vs. AAPI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDI.L drawdown since its inception was -47.34%, which is greater than AAPI.L's maximum drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDI.L and AAPI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDI.LAAPI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.34%

-36.20%

-11.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.34%

-36.20%

-11.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-22.52%

+21.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.07%

-17.55%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.75%

23.34%

+4.41%

Volatility

AMDI.L vs. AAPI.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) has a higher volatility of 23.14% compared to IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP (AAPI.L) at 8.90%. This indicates that AMDI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDI.LAAPI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.14%

8.90%

+14.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.81%

17.36%

+28.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.61%

47.20%

+27.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9,806.47%

40.27%

+9,766.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9,806.47%

40.27%

+9,766.20%

AMDI.L vs. AAPI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMDI.L and AAPI.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

AMDI.L vs. AAPI.L - Dividend Comparison

AMDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.56%, more than AAPI.L's 12.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AAPI.L
IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP
12.72%11.04%1.04%
AMDI.L
IncomeShares AMD Options ETP
44.56%8.85%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMDI.L and AAPI.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDI.L and AAPI.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDI.L and AAPI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer