PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPI.L vs. 3QQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AAPI.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP (AAPI.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AAPI.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AAPI.L
IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP
-11.83%-12.96%20.45%
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
-24.17%5.78%29.72%
Different Trading Currencies

AAPI.L is traded in GBp, while 3QQQ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3QQQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPI.L achieves a -11.83% return, which is significantly higher than 3QQQ.L's -24.17% return.


AAPI.L

1D
0.69%
1M
-6.68%
YTD
-11.83%
6M
-11.99%
1Y
-8.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

3QQQ.L

1D
1.65%
1M
-16.70%
YTD
-24.17%
6M
-21.34%
1Y
30.15%
3Y*
31.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAPI.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than 3QQQ.L's 0.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AAPI.L vs. 3QQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPI.L
AAPI.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
AAPI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPI.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP (AAPI.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPI.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.34

0.43

-0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.29

1.14

-1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.16

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

0.48

-0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.03

1.03

-2.05

AAPI.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPI.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPI.L and 3QQQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPI.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

0.43

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.21

-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between AAPI.L and 3QQQ.L is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AAPI.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

AAPI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.56%, while 3QQQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

AAPI.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPI.L drawdown since its inception was -31.31%, smaller than the maximum 3QQQ.L drawdown of -58.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPI.L and 3QQQ.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPI.L3QQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.31%

-58.93%

+27.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.98%

-47.89%

+28.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.86%

-46.87%

+23.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.35%

-20.83%

+6.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.26%

21.60%

-12.34%

Volatility

AAPI.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP (AAPI.L) is 3.90%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) has a volatility of 14.13%. This indicates that AAPI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3QQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AAPI.L3QQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

14.13%

-10.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.12%

52.99%

-38.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.14%

69.99%

-44.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.18%

63.05%

-38.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.18%

63.05%

-38.87%