PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDI.L vs. 2MU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AMDI.L is traded in USD, while 2MU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2MU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDI.L achieves a 116.03% return, which is significantly lower than 2MU.L's 616.93% return.


AMDI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.13%
6M
109.68%
YTD
116.03%
1Y
141.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

2MU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-24.75%
6M
459.16%
YTD
616.93%
1Y
3,375.70%
3Y*
288.99%
5Y*
93.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMDI.L
IncomeShares AMD Options ETP
116.03%12,701.59%
2MU.L
Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP
616.93%365.16%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDI.L and 2MU.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDI.L vs. 2MU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDI.L
AMDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AMDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

2MU.L
2MU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
2MU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2MU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
2MU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
2MU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
2MU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMDI.L2MU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.69

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

63.29

-60.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.10

200.45

-195.36

AMDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the 2MU.L Sharpe Ratio of 21.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDI.L and 2MU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDI.L drawdown since its inception was -47.34%, smaller than the maximum 2MU.L drawdown of -89.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDI.L and 2MU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDI.L2MU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.34%

-89.07%

+41.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.34%

-53.34%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-36.62%

+35.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.07%

-45.67%

+24.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.75%

16.84%

+10.91%

Volatility

AMDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) is 23.14%, while Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) has a volatility of 57.96%. This indicates that AMDI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2MU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDI.L2MU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.14%

57.96%

-34.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.81%

111.88%

-66.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.61%

154.18%

-79.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9,806.47%

112.50%

+9,693.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9,806.47%

106.70%

+9,699.77%

AMDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than 2MU.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Dividend Comparison

AMDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.56%, while 2MU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMDI.L and 2MU.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2MU.L.

AMDI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while 2MU.L is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AMDI.L and 0.75% for 2MU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDI.L and 2MU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer