AMDG vs. NBIG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG).

AMDG and NBIG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMDG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jan 24, 2025. NBIG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Oct 27, 2025.

Performance

AMDG vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMDG vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	-16.65%	-36.63%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	13.51%	-62.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDG achieves a -16.65% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 13.51% return.

AMDG

• 1D: 6.82%
• 1M: 8.29%
• YTD: -16.65%
• 6M: 21.40%
• 1Y: 149.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBIG

• 1D: 25.17%
• 1M: 14.22%
• YTD: 13.51%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDG vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMDG and NBIG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

AMDG

Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF

NBIG

Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF

Return for Risk

AMDG vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 71
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDG vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMDG	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.15	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMDG	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	-0.44	+0.86

Correlation

The correlation between AMDG and NBIG is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMDG vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.44%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	13.44%	11.21%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AMDG vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDG drawdown since its inception was -63.04%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDG and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDG	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.04%	-75.83%	+12.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.06%	-61.09%	+12.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.74%	-53.55%	+25.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMDG	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	98.81%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.88%	199.11%	-69.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	124.87%	199.11%	-74.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	124.87%	199.11%	-74.24%