AMDD vs. SH
AMDD (Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds. AMDD is actively managed, while SH is passively managed. Over the past year, AMDD returned -85.10% vs -17.23% for SH. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMDD charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SH.
Performance
AMDD vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMDD achieves a -67.83% return, which is significantly lower than SH's -8.00% return.
AMDD
- 1D
- -4.47%
- 1M
- -41.37%
- YTD
- -67.83%
- 6M
- -67.43%
- 1Y
- -85.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SH
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- -17.23%
- 3Y*
- -13.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.07%
- 10Y*
- -12.89%
AMDD vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMDD Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares | -67.83% | -60.76% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.00% | -9.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDD and SH is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.59 |
The correlation between AMDD and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDD vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
AMDD
SH
AMDD vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares (AMDD) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMDD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.61 | 0.77 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.95 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.62 | -1.75 | +0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMDD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.31 | -1.47 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.21 | -0.59 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
AMDD vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDD drawdown since its inception was -90.88%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDD and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.88% | -94.66% | +3.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.34% | -18.28% | -67.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.88% | -94.62% | +3.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.26% | -67.73% | +11.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.65% | 9.89% | +42.76% |
Volatility
AMDD vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares (AMDD) has a higher volatility of 27.50% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 2.84%. This indicates that AMDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.50% | 2.84% | +24.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.96% | 8.91% | +40.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.96% | 11.80% | +53.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.71% | 16.85% | +48.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.71% | 18.01% | +47.70% |
AMDD vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMDD has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMDD vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
AMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.24%, more than SH's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDD Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares | 18.24% | 5.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.51% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDD and SH have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDD has higher volatility (27.50%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDD dropped -90.88% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 1-year performance, SH leads with -17.23% vs -85.10% for AMDD. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SH has performed better with a -17.23% return vs -85.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for AMDD.
AMDD has the higher dividend yield at 18.24%, compared with 4.51% for SH.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for AMDD and 0.90% for SH.
AMDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.31 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMDD and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer