AMCR vs. BGS
AMCR (Amcor plc) and BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.) are both stocks. AMCR operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while BGS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, AMCR returned -3.25%/yr vs -27.79%/yr for BGS. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMCR vs. BGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMCR achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than BGS's -2.65% return.
AMCR
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- -5.24%
- 3Y*
- -2.02%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- —
BGS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -8.58%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- -25.46%
- 5Y*
- -27.79%
- 10Y*
- -14.86%
AMCR vs. BGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMCR Amcor plc | 0.28% | -6.17% | 2.61% | -14.97% | 3.20% | 6.16% | 13.41% | -0.09% |
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | -2.65% | -26.81% | -28.30% | 0.33% | -60.70% | 17.69% | 67.73% | -15.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMCR and BGS is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
AMCR:
$18.83B
BGS:
$323.22M
AMCR:
$1.59
BGS:
-$0.96
AMCR:
0.78
BGS:
0.18
AMCR:
0.50
BGS:
0.80
AMCR:
$22.19B
BGS:
$1.81B
AMCR:
$4.10B
BGS:
$388.44M
AMCR:
$2.58B
BGS:
$91.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMCR vs. BGS — Risk / Return Rank
AMCR
BGS
AMCR vs. BGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amcor plc (AMCR) and B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMCR | BGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.07 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 0.16 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 0.47 | -0.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMCR vs. BGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMCR drawdown since its inception was -47.21%, smaller than the maximum BGS drawdown of -86.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMCR and BGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMCR | BGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.21% | -86.50% | +39.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -33.11% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.92% | -67.36% | +37.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.24% | -84.68% | +50.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.02% | -83.99% | +57.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.56% | -32.06% | +17.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.88% | 11.32% | +3.56% |
Volatility
AMCR vs. BGS - Volatility Comparison
Amcor plc (AMCR) has a higher volatility of 10.56% compared to B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) at 9.65%. This indicates that AMCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMCR | BGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.56% | 9.65% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.86% | 33.85% | -7.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.71% | 51.42% | -19.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 49.32% | -24.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 46.31% | -17.05% |
Dividends
AMCR vs. BGS - Dividend Comparison
AMCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than BGS's 18.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMCR Amcor plc | 6.37% | 6.15% | 5.34% | 5.11% | 4.05% | 3.93% | 3.93% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 18.86% | 17.67% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% |
Financials
AMCR vs. BGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amcor plc and B&G Foods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMCR vs. BGS - Profitability Comparison
AMCR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amcor plc reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 5.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.1%.
BGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.89M and revenue of 408.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.
AMCR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amcor plc reported an operating income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.8%.
BGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.96M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.7%.
AMCR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amcor plc reported a net income of 278.00M and revenue of 5.91B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
BGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -32.54M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in a net margin of -8.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMCR and BGS have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMCR has higher volatility (10.56%) compared to BGS (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMCR dropped -47.21% vs BGS's -86.50%.
BGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMCR and BGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer