PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMCGX vs. BFGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMCGX vs. BFGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BFGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMCGX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly higher than BFGIX's 0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, AMCGX has underperformed BFGIX with an annualized return of 7.68%, while BFGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.04% annualized return.


AMCGX

1D
-0.68%
1M
3.81%
YTD
4.46%
6M
3.08%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
-4.27%
10Y*
7.68%

BFGIX

1D
-1.35%
1M
4.86%
YTD
0.58%
6M
11.97%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
20.48%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
21.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMCGX vs. BFGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMCGX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.46%16.63%20.10%22.85%-35.19%-29.98%63.90%29.63%-8.03%27.39%
BFGIX
Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares
0.58%22.26%29.85%27.78%-28.05%19.00%122.92%30.34%4.08%26.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AMCGX and BFGIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2009

0.83

The correlation between AMCGX and BFGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMCGX vs. BFGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMCGX
AMCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AMCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AMCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BFGIX
BFGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BFGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BFGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMCGX vs. BFGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BFGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMCGXBFGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.23

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

2.14

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

5.78

-2.15

AMCGX vs. BFGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the BFGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMCGX and BFGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMCGXBFGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.09

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.55

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.88

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.78

-0.74

Drawdowns

AMCGX vs. BFGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMCGX drawdown since its inception was -74.93%, which is greater than BFGIX's maximum drawdown of -43.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMCGX and BFGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMCGXBFGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.93%

-43.62%

-31.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.20%

-9.69%

-6.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.65%

-20.97%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.50%

-35.71%

-28.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.50%

-43.62%

-20.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.53%

-3.21%

-30.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.87%

-7.87%

-15.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.04%

3.58%

+1.46%

Volatility

AMCGX vs. BFGIX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BFGIX) have volatilities of 5.52% and 5.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMCGXBFGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

5.28%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

15.71%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.02%

19.12%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.48%

22.34%

+8.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.81%

23.99%

+2.82%

AMCGX vs. BFGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMCGX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than BFGIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMCGX vs. BFGIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMCGX nor BFGIX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMCGX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.34%13.72%10.98%7.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BFGIX
Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%11.79%15.01%2.78%1.74%1.05%2.07%5.92%6.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMCGX and BFGIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMCGX has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to BFGIX (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMCGX dropped -74.93% vs BFGIX's -43.62%.

BFGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMCGX and BFGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer