PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMBO vs. DLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMBO vs. DLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and Deluxe Corporation (DLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBO achieves a -17.39% return, which is significantly lower than DLX's 4.85% return.


AMBO

1D
-6.17%
1M
1.33%
YTD
-17.39%
6M
-50.33%
1Y
-24.00%
3Y*
-0.29%
5Y*
-36.39%
10Y*

DLX

1D
-3.91%
1M
-25.72%
YTD
4.85%
6M
11.65%
1Y
68.00%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
-8.37%
10Y*
-6.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMBO vs. DLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AMBO
Ambow Education Holding Ltd.
-17.39%31.43%52.67%-54.90%-66.96%-57.47%9.60%-63.54%34.74%
DLX
Deluxe Corporation
4.85%5.55%11.31%34.92%-44.40%13.38%-38.90%33.32%-42.32%

Correlation

The correlation between AMBO and DLX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018

0.05

The correlation between AMBO and DLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMBO:

$6.51M

DLX:

$1.06B

EPS

AMBO:

$13.55

DLX:

$2.34

PE Ratio

AMBO:

0.17

DLX:

9.78

PS Ratio

AMBO:

0.06

DLX:

0.49

PB Ratio

AMBO:

0.75

DLX:

0.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMBO:

$57.91M

DLX:

$2.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMBO:

$31.30M

DLX:

$1.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMBO:

$3.46M

DLX:

$327.18M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMBO vs. DLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBO
AMBO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AMBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

DLX
DLX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBO vs. DLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and Deluxe Corporation (DLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMBODLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.33

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

2.43

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

8.85

-9.42

AMBO vs. DLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBO Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the DLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBO and DLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMBODLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

1.56

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

-0.21

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.20

0.10

-0.30

Drawdowns

AMBO vs. DLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBO drawdown since its inception was -98.60%, which is greater than DLX's maximum drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBO and DLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMBODLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.60%

-84.62%

-13.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.57%

-28.09%

-45.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.57%

-40.93%

-32.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.16%

-68.77%

-27.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.90%

-56.94%

-39.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.51%

-28.56%

-49.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.00%

7.71%

+34.29%

Volatility

AMBO vs. DLX - Volatility Comparison

Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) has a higher volatility of 29.13% compared to Deluxe Corporation (DLX) at 19.99%. This indicates that AMBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMBODLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.13%

19.99%

+9.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.19%

30.78%

+32.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

117.33%

43.91%

+73.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

162.96%

39.40%

+123.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

154.82%

40.51%

+114.31%

Dividends

AMBO vs. DLX - Dividend Comparison

AMBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMBO
Ambow Education Holding Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DLX
Deluxe Corporation
5.25%5.37%5.31%5.59%7.07%3.74%4.11%2.40%3.12%1.56%1.68%2.20%

Financials

AMBO vs. DLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambow Education Holding Ltd. and Deluxe Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B-1.50B-1.00B-500.00M0.00500.00M20222023202420252026
2.80M
538.10M
(AMBO) Total Revenue
(DLX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMBO vs. DLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ambow Education Holding Ltd. and Deluxe Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
60.2%
51.9%
Portfolio components
AMBO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambow Education Holding Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.69M and revenue of 2.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.2%.

DLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deluxe Corporation reported a gross profit of 279.40M and revenue of 538.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.

AMBO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambow Education Holding Ltd. reported an operating income of 442.00K and revenue of 2.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

DLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deluxe Corporation reported an operating income of 71.80M and revenue of 538.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.

AMBO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambow Education Holding Ltd. reported a net income of 424.00K and revenue of 2.80M, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.

DLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deluxe Corporation reported a net income of 35.80M and revenue of 538.10M, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMBO and DLX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMBO has higher volatility (29.13%) compared to DLX (19.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBO dropped -98.60% vs DLX's -84.62%.

DLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMBO and DLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer