PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLX vs. EBF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DLX vs. EBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Deluxe Corporation (DLX) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLX achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than EBF's 21.97% return. Over the past 10 years, DLX has underperformed EBF with an annualized return of -6.04%, while EBF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.54% annualized return.


DLX

1D
1.80%
1M
-4.55%
YTD
3.85%
6M
4.59%
1Y
58.03%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
-8.28%
10Y*
-6.04%

EBF

1D
4.69%
1M
5.62%
YTD
21.97%
6M
21.50%
1Y
18.81%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
8.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLX vs. EBF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLX
Deluxe Corporation
3.85%5.55%11.31%34.92%-44.40%13.38%-38.90%33.32%-48.98%9.17%
EBF
Ennis, Inc.
21.97%-9.96%12.59%3.64%19.38%14.78%-13.46%17.54%-2.77%24.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DLX and EBF is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1987

0.35

The correlation between DLX and EBF shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

DLX:

$2.34

EBF:

$2.44

PE Ratio

DLX:

9.68

EBF:

8.76

PEG Ratio

DLX:

0.40

EBF:

0.51

PS Ratio

DLX:

0.49

EBF:

1.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

DLX:

$2.13B

EBF:

$296.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DLX:

$1.13B

EBF:

$92.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

DLX:

$327.18M

EBF:

$75.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLX vs. EBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLX
DLX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EBF
EBF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBF Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLX vs. EBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deluxe Corporation (DLX) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLXEBFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.16

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.66

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

3.73

+2.23

DLX vs. EBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the EBF Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLX and EBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLX vs. EBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLX drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than EBF's maximum drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLX and EBF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLXEBFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.62%

-73.10%

-11.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.36%

-11.41%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.93%

-22.80%

-18.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.65%

-22.80%

-45.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.61%

-35.32%

-43.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.35%

-3.11%

-54.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.60%

-20.56%

-8.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.77%

5.05%

+4.72%

Volatility

DLX vs. EBF - Volatility Comparison

Deluxe Corporation (DLX) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to Ennis, Inc. (EBF) at 7.29%. This indicates that DLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLXEBFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.64%

7.29%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.27%

16.93%

+14.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.78%

22.64%

+21.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.39%

21.47%

+17.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.54%

26.22%

+14.32%

Dividends

DLX vs. EBF - Dividend Comparison

DLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than EBF's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLX
Deluxe Corporation
5.30%5.37%5.31%5.59%7.07%3.74%4.11%2.40%3.12%1.56%1.68%2.20%
EBF
Ennis, Inc.
4.67%5.55%16.60%4.56%4.51%4.86%5.04%4.16%4.94%3.61%11.67%3.64%

Financials

DLX vs. EBF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Deluxe Corporation and Ennis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
538.10M
0
(DLX) Total Revenue
(EBF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DLX and EBF have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLX has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to EBF (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLX dropped -84.62% vs EBF's -73.10%.

DLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLX and EBF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer