AMAX vs. GLDB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AMAX (RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF) and GLDB (Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. AMAX is actively managed, while GLDB is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMAX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for GLDB.

Performance

AMAX vs. GLDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GLDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly higher than GLDB's -5.86% return.

AMAX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 6M: 3.96%
• 1Y: 12.42%
• 3Y*: 9.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDB

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: -6.56%
• YTD: -5.86%
• 6M: -3.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAX vs. GLDB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	4.98%	-2.42%
GLDB Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF	-5.86%	-3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX and GLDB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

AMAX vs. GLDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX

AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 34
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAX vs. GLDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GLDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMAX	GLDB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.33	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMAX	GLDB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	-0.37	+0.76

Drawdowns

AMAX vs. GLDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum GLDB drawdown of -27.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and GLDB.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMAX	GLDB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.28%	-27.36%	+11.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.80%	-25.08%	+23.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.32%	-13.35%	+8.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMAX	GLDB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.32%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.02%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.95%	39.99%	-30.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.36%	39.99%	-29.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.36%	39.99%	-29.63%

AMAX vs. GLDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDB's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMAX vs. GLDB - Dividend Comparison

AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.94%, more than GLDB's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	10.94%	9.18%	7.36%	6.99%	11.22%	1.00%
GLDB Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF	0.20%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMAX and GLDB in my portfolio?

AMAX and GLDB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMAX or GLDB?

On fees, GLDB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMAX or GLDB?

GLDB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AMAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMAX or GLDB?

AMAX has the higher dividend yield at 10.94%, compared with 0.20% for GLDB.

What is the main difference between AMAX and GLDB?

They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and Strategy Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for AMAX and 0.79% for GLDB.