PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAX vs. FIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMAX vs. FIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMAX vs. FIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
0.90%11.38%9.62%6.70%-1.78%
FIAX
Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF
-0.83%2.33%4.67%3.44%-0.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than FIAX's -0.83% return.


AMAX

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
0.90%
6M
-0.88%
1Y
14.84%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
10Y*

FIAX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
0.79%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMAX vs. FIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FIAX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMAX vs. FIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX
AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FIAX
FIAX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAX vs. FIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMAXFIAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

0.55

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

0.80

+1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.10

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

0.70

+1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.57

2.76

+3.81

AMAX vs. FIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the FIAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAX and FIAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMAXFIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.55

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.70

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX and FIAX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AMAX vs. FIAX - Dividend Comparison

AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.50%, more than FIAX's 8.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
10.50%9.18%7.36%6.99%11.22%1.00%
FIAX
Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF
8.29%8.17%8.11%4.81%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMAX vs. FIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, which is greater than FIAX's maximum drawdown of -6.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and FIAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMAXFIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-6.26%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-3.66%

-3.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.39%

-1.61%

-3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-0.87%

-4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

0.92%

+1.46%

Volatility

AMAX vs. FIAX - Volatility Comparison

RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX) at 1.59%. This indicates that AMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMAXFIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

1.59%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

3.16%

+5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

4.47%

+6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.38%

4.01%

+6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.38%

4.01%

+6.37%