PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAPX vs. GMOQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMAPX vs. GMOQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAPX achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than GMOQX's 8.73% return.


AMAPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.60%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
2.22%

GMOQX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.67%
YTD
8.73%
6M
9.27%
1Y
26.78%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAPX vs. GMOQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AMAPX
Amana Participation Fund
0.26%5.98%3.77%2.09%-5.27%-0.22%
GMOQX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI
8.73%22.45%12.60%17.76%-16.26%-2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAPX and GMOQX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021

0.50

The correlation between AMAPX and GMOQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMAPX vs. GMOQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAPX
AMAPX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AMAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

GMOQX
GMOQX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GMOQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAPX vs. GMOQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMAPXGMOQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

2.28

-0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

7.21

-5.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.37

31.30

-25.93

AMAPX vs. GMOQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the GMOQX Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAPX and GMOQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMAPXGMOQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

5.17

-3.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.74

+0.37

Drawdowns

AMAPX vs. GMOQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAPX drawdown since its inception was -7.75%, smaller than the maximum GMOQX drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAPX and GMOQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMAPXGMOQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-31.41%

+23.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-3.82%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.64%

-9.02%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

0.00%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-9.71%

+8.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.88%

-0.11%

Volatility

AMAPX vs. GMOQX - Volatility Comparison

Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX) have volatilities of 1.50% and 1.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMAPXGMOQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.49%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.98%

4.37%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19%

5.33%

-3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.19%

10.88%

-8.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.01%

10.88%

-8.87%

AMAPX vs. GMOQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAPX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOQX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMAPX vs. GMOQX - Dividend Comparison

AMAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than GMOQX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AMAPX
Amana Participation Fund
3.66%3.52%3.15%2.25%1.30%1.55%1.95%2.45%2.62%2.14%2.14%
GMOQX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI
5.86%6.37%6.23%10.36%13.87%7.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMAPX and GMOQX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAPX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to GMOQX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAPX dropped -7.75% vs GMOQX's -31.41%.

GMOQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMAPX and GMOQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer