AMAGX vs. LGILX
Compare and contrast key facts about Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX).
AMAGX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Feb 3, 1994. LGILX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Oct 14, 1997.
Performance
AMAGX vs. LGILX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMAGX vs. LGILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | -3.22% | 17.62% | 15.73% | 25.67% | -19.49% | 31.51% | 32.93% | 33.09% | 2.47% | 28.91% |
LGILX Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund | -8.44% | -0.54% | 31.98% | 48.08% | -38.11% | 20.06% | 38.40% | 32.59% | 2.00% | 33.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAGX achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly higher than LGILX's -8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAGX has outperformed LGILX with an annualized return of 15.74%, while LGILX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.28% annualized return.
AMAGX
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.74%
LGILX
- 1D
- 3.82%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- -8.44%
- 6M
- -19.88%
- 1Y
- 0.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMAGX vs. LGILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMAGX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than LGILX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMAGX vs. LGILX — Risk / Return Rank
AMAGX
LGILX
AMAGX vs. LGILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMAGX | LGILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.04 | +1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 0.23 | +1.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.04 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | -0.08 | +2.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | -0.21 | +8.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMAGX | LGILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.04 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.20 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.55 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.32 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAGX and LGILX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AMAGX vs. LGILX - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMAGX nor LGILX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.95% | 0.65% | 3.64% | 0.52% | 5.44% | 3.15% | 3.47% | 10.90% | 13.67% | 7.45% |
LGILX Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.95% | 18.16% | 13.58% | 13.58% | 5.22% | 8.46% | 8.42% | 13.64% | 1.65% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AMAGX vs. LGILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAGX drawdown since its inception was -57.64%, smaller than the maximum LGILX drawdown of -67.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAGX and LGILX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMAGX | LGILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.64% | -67.74% | +10.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -26.18% | +14.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | -43.00% | +14.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.09% | -43.00% | +14.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.87% | -23.36% | +15.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -21.31% | +10.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 10.18% | -7.34% |
Volatility
AMAGX vs. LGILX - Volatility Comparison
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) have volatilities of 7.18% and 6.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMAGX | LGILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 6.98% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 19.85% | -7.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 26.60% | -6.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 26.28% | -8.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 24.07% | -5.76% |