ALZN vs. XLU
ALZN (Alzamend Neuro, Inc.) is a stock, while XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Over the past 3 years, ALZN returned -89.47%/yr vs 13.74%/yr for XLU. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALZN vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALZN achieves a -36.81% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 3.11% return.
ALZN
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- -36.81%
- 6M
- -44.17%
- 1Y
- -69.97%
- 3Y*
- -89.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLU
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 9.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
ALZN vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALZN Alzamend Neuro, Inc. | -36.81% | -82.57% | -86.97% | -89.50% | -70.27% | -85.93% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.11% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 10.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALZN and XLU is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2021 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALZN vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
ALZN
XLU
ALZN vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alzamend Neuro, Inc. (ALZN) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALZN | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | 0.63 | -1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | 0.94 | -2.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.12 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 1.00 | -1.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | 2.24 | -3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALZN | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 | 0.63 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 0.40 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
ALZN vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALZN drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALZN and XLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALZN | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -51.98% | -48.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.40% | -9.18% | -69.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.91% | -17.26% | -82.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -7.78% | -92.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.67% | -10.22% | -84.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.72% | 4.09% | +44.63% |
Volatility
ALZN vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
Alzamend Neuro, Inc. (ALZN) has a higher volatility of 20.35% compared to State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) at 5.41%. This indicates that ALZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALZN | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.35% | 5.41% | +14.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.62% | 11.53% | +54.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.26% | 14.57% | +61.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 128.28% | 17.32% | +110.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 128.28% | 19.26% | +109.02% |
Dividends
ALZN vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
ALZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALZN Alzamend Neuro, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.72% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALZN and XLU have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALZN has higher volatility (20.35%) compared to XLU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALZN dropped -100.00% vs XLU's -51.98%.
XLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALZN and XLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer