ALZFX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger Focus Equity Fund Class Z (ALZFX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
ALZFX is an actively managed fund by Alger. It was launched on Nov 8, 1993. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
ALZFX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ALZFX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALZFX Alger Focus Equity Fund Class Z | -13.58% | 40.08% | 52.22% | 44.63% | -35.75% | 20.37% | 46.19% | 34.29% | 1.68% | 29.12% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -2.49% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALZFX achieves a -13.58% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ALZFX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 18.62%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.96% annualized return.
ALZFX
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- YTD
- -13.58%
- 6M
- -14.05%
- 1Y
- 36.44%
- 3Y*
- 32.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 18.62%
FCGSX
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 38.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 14.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ALZFX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALZFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ALZFX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
ALZFX
FCGSX
ALZFX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Focus Equity Fund Class Z (ALZFX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALZFX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.66 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 2.34 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 2.98 | -1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.44 | 13.43 | -6.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALZFX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.66 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.63 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.95 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.88 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between ALZFX and FCGSX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ALZFX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
ALZFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, less than FCGSX's 10.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALZFX Alger Focus Equity Fund Class Z | 8.72% | 7.53% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.10% | 13.63% | 6.16% | 2.21% | 5.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 10.74% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
ALZFX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALZFX drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALZFX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALZFX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.22% | -38.77% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.45% | -13.10% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.22% | -38.77% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.22% | -38.77% | -4.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.45% | -6.44% | -11.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -7.05% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 2.91% | +2.18% |
Volatility
ALZFX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alger Focus Equity Fund Class Z (ALZFX) is 7.56%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that ALZFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ALZFX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 8.15% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.39% | 14.39% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.14% | 24.14% | +3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 23.69% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.80% | 23.19% | +0.61% |