ALUM.L vs. SPLT.L
ALUM.L (WisdomTree Aluminium) and SPLT.L (iShares Physical Platinum ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - ALUM.L is a Metals fund tracking the Bloomberg Aluminum, while SPLT.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ALUM.L returned 6.81%/yr vs 6.37%/yr for SPLT.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ALUM.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPLT.L.
Performance
ALUM.L vs. SPLT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ALUM.L is traded in USD, while SPLT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPLT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALUM.L achieves a 25.85% return, which is significantly higher than SPLT.L's -5.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ALUM.L has outperformed SPLT.L with an annualized return of 6.81%, while SPLT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.37% annualized return.
ALUM.L
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 25.85%
- 6M
- 29.08%
- 1Y
- 52.01%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
SPLT.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -5.51%
- 6M
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 72.68%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 6.37%
ALUM.L vs. SPLT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALUM.L WisdomTree Aluminium | 25.85% | 17.98% | 4.62% | -4.48% | -15.92% | 38.11% | 1.95% | -3.12% | -18.30% | 29.16% |
SPLT.L iShares Physical Platinum ETC | -5.51% | 120.07% | -9.90% | -6.07% | 10.71% | -10.99% | 10.32% | 22.42% | -15.00% | 1.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALUM.L and SPLT.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALUM.L vs. SPLT.L — Risk / Return Rank
ALUM.L
SPLT.L
ALUM.L vs. SPLT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) and iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALUM.L | SPLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.27 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.84 | 2.03 | +3.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.87 | 4.22 | +16.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALUM.L | SPLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 1.49 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.31 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.22 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.00 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
ALUM.L vs. SPLT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALUM.L drawdown since its inception was -77.63%, which is greater than SPLT.L's maximum drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALUM.L and SPLT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALUM.L | SPLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.63% | -70.11% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -35.57% | +26.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.63% | -35.57% | +14.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.34% | -35.57% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.34% | -51.44% | +4.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.28% | -33.68% | -15.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.59% | -42.93% | -15.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 17.16% | -14.68% |
Volatility
ALUM.L vs. SPLT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) is 6.12%, while iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) has a volatility of 11.80%. This indicates that ALUM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALUM.L | SPLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 11.80% | -5.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.69% | 42.93% | -27.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.20% | 48.46% | -30.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 32.41% | -9.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 29.28% | -9.27% |
ALUM.L vs. SPLT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALUM.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLT.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALUM.L vs. SPLT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALUM.L nor SPLT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALUM.L and SPLT.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPLT.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPLT.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ALUM.L.
ALUM.L is categorized as Metals, while SPLT.L is Precious Metals. ALUM.L tracks Bloomberg Aluminum, while SPLT.L tracks Platinum. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ALUM.L and 0.20% for SPLT.L.
Find the right allocation for ALUM.L and SPLT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer