PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALUM.L vs. COPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALUM.L vs. COPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) and WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALUM.L achieves a 25.85% return, which is significantly higher than COPA.L's 13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ALUM.L has underperformed COPA.L with an annualized return of 6.81%, while COPA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.33% annualized return.


ALUM.L

1D
-0.93%
1M
2.73%
YTD
25.85%
6M
29.08%
1Y
52.01%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
6.81%

COPA.L

1D
0.27%
1M
9.03%
YTD
13.93%
6M
21.07%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALUM.L vs. COPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALUM.L
WisdomTree Aluminium
25.85%17.98%4.62%-4.48%-15.92%38.11%1.95%-3.12%-18.30%29.16%
COPA.L
WisdomTree Copper
13.93%36.37%4.81%2.66%-13.58%24.36%21.41%4.90%-20.37%26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ALUM.L and COPA.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2007

0.51

The correlation between ALUM.L and COPA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALUM.L vs. COPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALUM.L
ALUM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ALUM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

COPA.L
COPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
COPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
COPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALUM.L vs. COPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) and WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALUM.LCOPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.22

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.84

1.19

+4.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.87

2.57

+18.29

ALUM.L vs. COPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALUM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the COPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALUM.L and COPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALUM.LCOPA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

0.91

+1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.27

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.44

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.09

-0.20

Drawdowns

ALUM.L vs. COPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALUM.L drawdown since its inception was -77.63%, which is greater than COPA.L's maximum drawdown of -67.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALUM.L and COPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALUM.LCOPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.63%

-67.44%

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-25.25%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.63%

-25.25%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.34%

-34.64%

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.34%

-38.75%

-8.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.28%

-2.26%

-47.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.59%

-33.24%

-25.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

11.73%

-9.25%

Volatility

ALUM.L vs. COPA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) is 6.12%, while WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that ALUM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALUM.LCOPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

8.83%

-2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.69%

18.91%

-3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.20%

33.17%

-14.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.79%

26.20%

-3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.01%

23.28%

-3.27%

ALUM.L vs. COPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ALUM.L and COPA.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

ALUM.L vs. COPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALUM.L nor COPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ALUM.L and COPA.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ALUM.L and COPA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

ALUM.L tracks Bloomberg Aluminum, while COPA.L tracks Bloomberg Copper Subindex.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALUM.L and COPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer