PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALUM.L vs. B4NB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALUM.L vs. B4NB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) and BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (TR) ETC USD (B4NB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ALUM.L is traded in USD, while B4NB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the B4NB.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALUM.L achieves a 25.85% return, which is significantly higher than B4NB.DE's 11.02% return.


ALUM.L

1D
-0.93%
1M
2.73%
YTD
25.85%
6M
29.08%
1Y
52.01%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
6.81%

B4NB.DE

1D
0.98%
1M
4.59%
YTD
11.02%
6M
23.01%
1Y
47.23%
3Y*
24.05%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALUM.L vs. B4NB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALUM.L
WisdomTree Aluminium
25.85%17.98%4.62%-4.48%-15.92%38.11%1.95%-3.12%-18.30%15.56%
B4NB.DE
BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (TR) ETC USD
11.02%52.62%3.57%9.42%-13.72%11.84%35.21%2.69%-20.58%39.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ALUM.L and B4NB.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2017

0.48

The correlation between ALUM.L and B4NB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALUM.L vs. B4NB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALUM.L
ALUM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ALUM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

B4NB.DE
B4NB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
B4NB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
B4NB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
B4NB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
B4NB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
B4NB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALUM.L vs. B4NB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) and BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (TR) ETC USD (B4NB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALUM.LB4NB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.36

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.84

3.32

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.87

10.58

+10.29

ALUM.L vs. B4NB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALUM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the B4NB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALUM.L and B4NB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALUM.LB4NB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.16

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.33

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.54

-0.65

Drawdowns

ALUM.L vs. B4NB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALUM.L drawdown since its inception was -77.63%, which is greater than B4NB.DE's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALUM.L and B4NB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALUM.LB4NB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.63%

-43.56%

-34.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-14.14%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.63%

-17.89%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.34%

-41.21%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.28%

-2.91%

-46.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.59%

-15.63%

-42.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

4.45%

-1.97%

Volatility

ALUM.L vs. B4NB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) is 6.12%, while BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (TR) ETC USD (B4NB.DE) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that ALUM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than B4NB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALUM.LB4NB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

6.93%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.69%

17.96%

-2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.20%

21.80%

-3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.79%

23.94%

-1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.01%

22.70%

-2.69%

ALUM.L vs. B4NB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALUM.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than B4NB.DE's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALUM.L vs. B4NB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALUM.L nor B4NB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ALUM.L and B4NB.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ALUM.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ALUM.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for B4NB.DE.

ALUM.L tracks Bloomberg Aluminum, while B4NB.DE tracks RICI Enhanced Copper. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ALUM.L and 0.99% for B4NB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALUM.L and B4NB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer