PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALTY vs. URA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALTY vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ALTY having a 6.45% return and URA slightly higher at 6.67%. Over the past 10 years, ALTY has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 6.15%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 16.42% annualized return.


ALTY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6.45%
6M
6.36%
1Y
14.94%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
6.15%

URA

1D
-2.61%
1M
-6.90%
YTD
6.67%
6M
2.57%
1Y
27.21%
3Y*
34.68%
5Y*
20.40%
10Y*
16.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTY vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALTY
Global X Alternative Income ETF
6.45%11.07%10.88%10.58%-11.92%23.08%-12.82%21.44%-6.18%10.82%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
6.67%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-3.54%-22.11%19.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTY and URA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALTY vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTY
ALTY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTY Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTY vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALTYURADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.13

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

0.87

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.92

1.87

+14.05

ALTY vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTY and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALTY vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTY drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTY and URA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALTYURADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.47%

-93.54%

+42.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.34%

-31.48%

+27.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-37.81%

+27.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.48%

-37.90%

+19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.47%

-61.45%

+9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-48.27%

+47.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-74.90%

+68.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

14.58%

-13.64%

Volatility

ALTY vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY) is 1.56%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 17.86%. This indicates that ALTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALTYURADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

17.86%

-16.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

39.53%

-34.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.90%

51.33%

-45.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.57%

43.92%

-33.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

37.95%

-21.40%

ALTY vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALTY vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

ALTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than URA's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALTY
Global X Alternative Income ETF
7.46%7.50%7.88%7.31%7.66%6.88%9.20%8.74%8.49%7.52%8.20%4.21%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
4.57%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALTY and URA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URA has higher volatility (17.86%) compared to ALTY (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTY dropped -51.47% vs URA's -93.54%.

On 10-year performance, URA leads with 16.42% vs 6.15% for ALTY. On fees, ALTY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ALTY has been the lower-risk option at 1.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 16.42% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ALTY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

ALTY has the higher dividend yield at 7.46%, compared with 4.57% for URA.

ALTY is categorized as Global Allocation, while URA is Uranium. ALTY tracks Indxx SuperDividend Alternatives Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ALTY and 0.69% for URA.

ALTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALTY and URA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer