ALTL vs. SRVR
ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ALTL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ALTL returned 5.11%/yr vs -1.27%/yr for SRVR. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
ALTL vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALTL achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 17.97% return.
ALTL
- 1D
- -3.95%
- 1M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 15.79%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 39.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.68%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 6M
- 18.04%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.93%
- 5Y*
- -1.27%
- 10Y*
- —
ALTL vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 15.79% | 16.61% | 12.30% | -15.85% | -10.67% | 45.30% | 35.38% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 17.97% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 3.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALTL and SRVR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.52 |
The correlation between ALTL and SRVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALTL vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
ALTL
SRVR
ALTL vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALTL | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.07 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 0.40 | +3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.55 | 0.84 | +12.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALTL vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALTL drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTL and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALTL | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.91% | -40.99% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -14.78% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.21% | -18.34% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.91% | -40.99% | +9.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.95% | -13.62% | +9.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.50% | -15.24% | +3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 6.94% | -4.04% |
Volatility
ALTL vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a higher volatility of 11.62% compared to Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) at 5.66%. This indicates that ALTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALTL | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.62% | 5.66% | +5.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.20% | 13.59% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.53% | 17.29% | +3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 19.78% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 21.44% | -0.97% |
ALTL vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ALTL and SRVR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
ALTL vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SRVR's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 0.88% | 0.95% | 1.56% | 1.28% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.59% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALTL and SRVR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALTL has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to SRVR (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTL dropped -31.91% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, ALTL leads with 5.11% vs -1.27% for SRVR. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ALTL has performed better with a 5.11% return vs -1.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ALTL and SRVR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.88% for ALTL.
ALTL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SRVR is REIT. ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index.
ALTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALTL and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer