PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALTHX vs. ACGYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALTHX vs. ACGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio (ALTHX) and AB Income Fund (ACGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTHX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than ACGYX's -0.71% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: ALTHX at 1.89% and ACGYX at 1.89%.


ALTHX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.46%
6M
0.30%
YTD
0.50%
1Y
6.16%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*
1.89%
ALL TIME*
3.90%

ACGYX

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.63%
6M
-0.71%
YTD
-0.71%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
-0.60%
10Y*
1.89%
ALL TIME*
2.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ALTHX vs. ACGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALTHX
AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio
0.50%5.05%2.36%5.76%-10.06%2.15%4.77%7.22%0.46%5.75%
ACGYX
AB Income Fund
-0.71%7.86%2.07%6.16%-15.45%-1.30%6.88%11.25%-1.21%6.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTHX and ACGYX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016

0.58

The correlation between ALTHX and ACGYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALTHX vs. ACGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTHX
ALTHX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ALTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ACGYX
ACGYX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ACGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ACGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTHX vs. ACGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio (ALTHX) and AB Income Fund (ACGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALTHXACGYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.14

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

1.00

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

2.82

+4.69

ALTHX vs. ACGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the ACGYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTHX and ACGYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALTHX vs. ACGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTHX drawdown since its inception was -15.22%, smaller than the maximum ACGYX drawdown of -21.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTHX and ACGYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALTHXACGYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.22%

-21.58%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-3.36%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.17%

-6.26%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.37%

-21.58%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.37%

-21.58%

+7.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-3.49%

+1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

-5.36%

+3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

1.19%

-0.37%

Volatility

ALTHX vs. ACGYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio (ALTHX) is 0.82%, while AB Income Fund (ACGYX) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that ALTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALTHXACGYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

1.03%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.13%

3.51%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71%

4.36%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.90%

6.52%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.96%

5.48%

-1.52%

ALTHX vs. ACGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ACGYX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALTHX vs. ACGYX - Dividend Comparison

ALTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than ACGYX's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACGYX
AB Income Fund
5.00%5.02%5.38%4.04%3.99%2.95%3.80%4.50%4.54%5.84%3.23%0.00%
ALTHX
AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio
3.56%4.55%3.27%2.73%2.34%1.57%2.43%2.84%3.12%3.01%3.11%3.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALTHX and ACGYX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACGYX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to ALTHX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTHX dropped -15.22% vs ACGYX's -21.58%.

ALTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALTHX and ACGYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer