ALTFX vs. APGZX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX).
ALTFX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Feb 28, 1982. APGZX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 1, 2015.
Performance
ALTFX vs. APGZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ALTFX vs. APGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTFX AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund | -10.89% | 6.22% | 5.94% | 15.97% | -27.19% | 22.64% | 39.40% | 33.60% | -9.86% | 37.16% |
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z | -12.76% | 13.26% | 25.47% | 35.12% | -28.74% | 29.00% | 34.47% | 34.24% | 2.30% | 31.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALTFX achieves a -10.89% return, which is significantly higher than APGZX's -12.76% return. Over the past 10 years, ALTFX has underperformed APGZX with an annualized return of 9.62%, while APGZX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.52% annualized return.
ALTFX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -9.85%
- YTD
- -10.89%
- 6M
- -13.62%
- 1Y
- 1.12%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.62%
APGZX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -12.55%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ALTFX vs. APGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALTFX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than APGZX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ALTFX vs. APGZX — Risk / Return Rank
ALTFX
APGZX
ALTFX vs. APGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALTFX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.05 | 0.40 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.20 | 0.73 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.10 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 0.34 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 1.34 | -1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALTFX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 0.40 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.44 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.74 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.73 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between ALTFX and APGZX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ALTFX vs. APGZX - Dividend Comparison
ALTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.18%, more than APGZX's 11.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTFX AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund | 15.18% | 13.53% | 8.18% | 0.03% | 2.61% | 9.99% | 7.23% | 6.01% | 8.36% | 0.00% | 4.05% |
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z | 11.19% | 9.77% | 6.62% | 1.69% | 0.87% | 7.19% | 2.60% | 3.49% | 9.11% | 3.78% | 2.72% |
Drawdowns
ALTFX vs. APGZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALTFX drawdown since its inception was -80.01%, which is greater than APGZX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTFX and APGZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALTFX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.01% | -33.87% | -46.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.81% | -15.21% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.87% | -33.87% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.87% | -33.87% | -2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.56% | -15.21% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.13% | -6.08% | -31.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 3.90% | +1.03% |
Volatility
ALTFX vs. APGZX - Volatility Comparison
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) at 5.13%. This indicates that ALTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ALTFX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 5.13% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.66% | 10.81% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.53% | 19.91% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 20.12% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 19.60% | -1.64% |